National League Standings, June 28, 1970
METS FANS SHARE THEIR MEMORIES OF THE JUNE 28, 1970 GAME:
NYB Buff
October 16, 2024
With the score tied in the sixth inning, Art Shamsky scored on an apparent sacrifice fly by Joe Foy. Shamsky was ruled out on the play after leaving third base too early for an inning-ending double play. An argument ensued and Gil Hodges was ejected from the game. It was one of only seven ejections that Hodges would receive as a major league manager.
The Mets took the lead in the top of the eighth on Dave Marshall's solo home run. With one out in the bottom half, Rusty Staub hit a two-run homer to put the Expos ahead to stay. The loss for the Mets dropped the team into a tie for first place with the Pirates, who swept a doubleheader over the Cubs in the last two games ever played at Pittsburgh's Forbes Field.
Dave VW
October 24, 2024
Great summation by NYB Buff. Lindsey Nelson and Bob Murphy both strongly believed the umps blew the call during the 6th inning, and that run proved to be the difference maker for the Mets in this loss. Despite outhitting the Expos 12-6, the Mets left 11 runners on base to drop the rubber match of the series and negate a pretty good start from Ray Sadecki.
Now it's your turn! Tell us what you remember of this game:
Please note:
We're looking for your comments about this specific
game. We've had people use this space to share their thoughts on how the
current season is going, or on ways that the Mets can improve the team.
Such comments, unless in the context of
this particular game,
will be considered off-topic and will be removed.
Example One
The Mets suck! They need to trade Smith and get somebody like
Jones.
This comment is off-topic and will be removed. It has nothing to do with
any specific game. But here's an acceptable alternative:
Example Two
The Mets suck! Smith made three errors in this game, and hit into a
double play, and the Mets blew a 5-0 lead. They need to get rid of Smith
and get somebody like Jones.
See the difference? Here you're getting the same point across, but it's in
the proper context. We wouldn't consider this message to be off-topic, and
we would let it remain.
We do appreciate anybody who takes the time to share their thoughts on our
site, and we hate to remove anybody's postings. But if we didn't take
steps to ensure that only on-topic messages were retained, The Ultimate
Mets Database would become a confusing jumble of unrelated comments,
and would thus be less enjoyable to visitors like you.
Thank you!