National League Standings, August 1, 1970
METS FANS SHARE THEIR MEMORIES OF THE AUGUST 1, 1970 GAME:
Tom Sullivan
December 29, 2008
Dad and I got free mezzanine tickets from a neighbor. Seaver was in control from the start, fanning 13 Padres in a 4-2 win. Ollie Brown got around on him for 2-run shot. He fanned Nate Colbert 4 times. Cleon Jones popped a 3-run shot into the visitors bullpen. In April of that year, Tom Terrific struck out 19 Padres at Shea, the last 10 in a row! San Diego was a second-year expansion club with a dreadful lineup. However 32 whiffs in 18 innings is impressive.
Glenn
March 23, 2021
I was invited to come to the game with my best friend and his parents to celebrate his 12th birthday. Both of us were huge baseball fans, and being from Connecticut I was a Yankees fan, he was a Red Sox fan, and we both sort of followed and liked the Mets (this was the season after the Miracle Mets of 1969). I remember a short rain delay, or maybe a brief shower, because the organist played " Raindrops Keep Falling on my Head" as the shower was happening. We were under cover, fortunately. Yes, Seaver in control the whole way.
Now it's your turn! Tell us what you remember of this game:
Please note:
We're looking for your comments about this specific
game. We've had people use this space to share their thoughts on how the
current season is going, or on ways that the Mets can improve the team.
Such comments, unless in the context of
this particular game,
will be considered off-topic and will be removed.
Example One
The Mets suck! They need to trade Smith and get somebody like
Jones.
This comment is off-topic and will be removed. It has nothing to do with
any specific game. But here's an acceptable alternative:
Example Two
The Mets suck! Smith made three errors in this game, and hit into a
double play, and the Mets blew a 5-0 lead. They need to get rid of Smith
and get somebody like Jones.
See the difference? Here you're getting the same point across, but it's in
the proper context. We wouldn't consider this message to be off-topic, and
we would let it remain.
We do appreciate anybody who takes the time to share their thoughts on our
site, and we hate to remove anybody's postings. But if we didn't take
steps to ensure that only on-topic messages were retained, The Ultimate
Mets Database would become a confusing jumble of unrelated comments,
and would thus be less enjoyable to visitors like you.
Thank you!