National League Standings, April 26, 1974
METS FANS SHARE THEIR MEMORIES OF THE APRIL 26, 1974 GAME:
Bob P
April 28, 2006
The Mets, who had lost 11 of their first 15 games in 1974, looked good on this night at Candlestick Park.
Felix Millan and Cleon Jones scored in the top of the first thanks to an error by Giants 2B Bruce Miller. The Mets added three more in the third, with the third run of the inning coming on an RBI single by Tom Seaver. Seaver singled again and drove in the Mets' sixth run in the eighth. Tom also pitched a four-hitter, walking none and striking out seven. Seaver retired 16 batters in a row between the fourth and ninth innings, and Tom finished the game by retiring 18 of the last 19 batters he faced.
NYB Buff
September 5, 2019
Tom Seaver was dominant in this game. He pitched a four-hitter with seven strikeouts and no walks for a solid win at Candlestick Park. Seaver even helped his own cause with a pair of RBI singles to boot. The Giants just couldn't handle him all night long.
Here's an amazing fact. This was the fourth time over a five-year span that Tom had a complete game win without issuing a base-on-balls on April 26th. Unlike his previous gems on that date in '70, '71 and '72, this one was a shutout.
Now it's your turn! Tell us what you remember of this game:
Please note:
We're looking for your comments about this specific
game. We've had people use this space to share their thoughts on how the
current season is going, or on ways that the Mets can improve the team.
Such comments, unless in the context of
this particular game,
will be considered off-topic and will be removed.
Example One
The Mets suck! They need to trade Smith and get somebody like
Jones.
This comment is off-topic and will be removed. It has nothing to do with
any specific game. But here's an acceptable alternative:
Example Two
The Mets suck! Smith made three errors in this game, and hit into a
double play, and the Mets blew a 5-0 lead. They need to get rid of Smith
and get somebody like Jones.
See the difference? Here you're getting the same point across, but it's in
the proper context. We wouldn't consider this message to be off-topic, and
we would let it remain.
We do appreciate anybody who takes the time to share their thoughts on our
site, and we hate to remove anybody's postings. But if we didn't take
steps to ensure that only on-topic messages were retained, The Ultimate
Mets Database would become a confusing jumble of unrelated comments,
and would thus be less enjoyable to visitors like you.
Thank you!