National League Standings, June 23, 1983
METS FANS SHARE THEIR MEMORIES OF THE JUNE 23, 1983 GAME:
Doctor Worm
May 22, 2009
A five inning save for Doug Sisk. We may never see that again. Well, we certainly won't see it again from Doug Sisk.
Doug Brogowski
November 18, 2009
I went to this game. Thursday afternoon game. Long, beautiful late June day. I had literally just graduated high school that week. I got my first personal look at newly acquired Keith Hernandez and rookie phenom Darryl Strawberry, who had just been brought up in May. Things were starting to look up, after 6 straight bad seasons.
NYB Buff
July 11, 2023
Before seeing the box score of this game, I thought that the maximum a relief pitcher could go in order to get credit for a save was four innings. My theory was based on the rule of a starter having to pitch a minimum of five innings to qualify for the win. But as Doctor Worm stated, Doug Sisk pitched five innings for the save here. The win went to fellow reliever Carlos Diaz, who got through the top of the fourth before Junior Ortiz's RBI single and Hubie Brooks' three-run homer put the Mets ahead to stay in the bottom half. Sisk then entered and did something that no Met pitcher had ever achieved over the team's first twenty-one seasons. A five-inning save is a rarity.
Now it's your turn! Tell us what you remember of this game:
Please note:
We're looking for your comments about this specific
game. We've had people use this space to share their thoughts on how the
current season is going, or on ways that the Mets can improve the team.
Such comments, unless in the context of
this particular game,
will be considered off-topic and will be removed.
Example One
The Mets suck! They need to trade Smith and get somebody like
Jones.
This comment is off-topic and will be removed. It has nothing to do with
any specific game. But here's an acceptable alternative:
Example Two
The Mets suck! Smith made three errors in this game, and hit into a
double play, and the Mets blew a 5-0 lead. They need to get rid of Smith
and get somebody like Jones.
See the difference? Here you're getting the same point across, but it's in
the proper context. We wouldn't consider this message to be off-topic, and
we would let it remain.
We do appreciate anybody who takes the time to share their thoughts on our
site, and we hate to remove anybody's postings. But if we didn't take
steps to ensure that only on-topic messages were retained, The Ultimate
Mets Database would become a confusing jumble of unrelated comments,
and would thus be less enjoyable to visitors like you.
Thank you!