National League Standings, August 25, 1989
METS FANS SHARE THEIR MEMORIES OF THE AUGUST 25, 1989 GAME:
Educated Fan
May 28, 2010
This had a very frustrating occurrence. In the 6th inning, the pitcher Ed Whitson doubles, and the Mets believe that he did not touch first base. So they appeal. However, Sid Fernandez balks in the process. Ed Whitson takes third, and the appeal is lost.
Mental errors like this were not uncommon with the Mets in this era.
Michael
September 15, 2020
Just watched this one on the old tape. To add to the above comment about Sid's balk.....right after it happened, Davey Johnson was screaming at his infield to try the appeal play again to see if Whitson missed 1st base, but they weren't moving from their positions and Davey didnt seem to understand why until he came out of the dugout and realized that the umpires told the Mets infield that due to the balk, an appeal of the previous play was no longer allowed.
Not only that, but the next two batters both hit homers off Sid to give the Padres the lead. Truly a strange sequence in year full of them. 1989 truly was the weirdest season in Mets history (at least in my view)
Now it's your turn! Tell us what you remember of this game:
Please note:
We're looking for your comments about this specific
game. We've had people use this space to share their thoughts on how the
current season is going, or on ways that the Mets can improve the team.
Such comments, unless in the context of
this particular game,
will be considered off-topic and will be removed.
Example One
The Mets suck! They need to trade Smith and get somebody like
Jones.
This comment is off-topic and will be removed. It has nothing to do with
any specific game. But here's an acceptable alternative:
Example Two
The Mets suck! Smith made three errors in this game, and hit into a
double play, and the Mets blew a 5-0 lead. They need to get rid of Smith
and get somebody like Jones.
See the difference? Here you're getting the same point across, but it's in
the proper context. We wouldn't consider this message to be off-topic, and
we would let it remain.
We do appreciate anybody who takes the time to share their thoughts on our
site, and we hate to remove anybody's postings. But if we didn't take
steps to ensure that only on-topic messages were retained, The Ultimate
Mets Database would become a confusing jumble of unrelated comments,
and would thus be less enjoyable to visitors like you.
Thank you!