National League Standings, April 19, 1990
METS FANS SHARE THEIR MEMORIES OF THE APRIL 19, 1990 GAME:
Dave VW
August 16, 2022
The main story of this game was the return to form of Dwight Gooden. Doc battled a shoulder injury in 1989, which limited him to 17 starts, his last on July 1 (though he pitched twice out of the bullpen in September). He then struggled in his fist two starts of 1990, allowing 10 runs over 7.2 combined innings vs. Pittsburgh and Montreal, leading to questions of whether Doc's arm may be done. He quieted those rumors here, going 7 strong without giving up an extra-base hit and striking out 7 during a 117-pitch outing to get his first win of the year. He continued to pitch well the rest of the year en route to 19 wins and a fourth-place finish in the Cy Young vote. 1990 can be considered the last of Doc's vintage seasons.
There really wasn't much offense to speak of for either team, as the Cubs struck out 11 times and the Mets 10 while they combined for just 7 hits. It was a chilly, breezy day, and the game started at 3pm eastern, so those infamous late afternoon Shea Stadium shadows made life miserable on hitters during the later innings, which all likely contributed to the lack of offense.
Now it's your turn! Tell us what you remember of this game:
Please note:
We're looking for your comments about this specific
game. We've had people use this space to share their thoughts on how the
current season is going, or on ways that the Mets can improve the team.
Such comments, unless in the context of
this particular game,
will be considered off-topic and will be removed.
Example One
The Mets suck! They need to trade Smith and get somebody like
Jones.
This comment is off-topic and will be removed. It has nothing to do with
any specific game. But here's an acceptable alternative:
Example Two
The Mets suck! Smith made three errors in this game, and hit into a
double play, and the Mets blew a 5-0 lead. They need to get rid of Smith
and get somebody like Jones.
See the difference? Here you're getting the same point across, but it's in
the proper context. We wouldn't consider this message to be off-topic, and
we would let it remain.
We do appreciate anybody who takes the time to share their thoughts on our
site, and we hate to remove anybody's postings. But if we didn't take
steps to ensure that only on-topic messages were retained, The Ultimate
Mets Database would become a confusing jumble of unrelated comments,
and would thus be less enjoyable to visitors like you.
Thank you!