Previous Game:
August 23, 2005
Mets 14, Diamondbacks 1
2005 Regular Season Game 126
August 24, 2005
Mets 18, Diamondbacks 4
Next Game:
August 25, 2005
Mets 3, Diamondbacks 1
Click to view scorecard

National League Standings, August 24, 2005

Box Score Game Memories Scorecard Mets Stats
Thru This Game

METS FANS SHARE THEIR MEMORIES OF THE AUGUST 24, 2005 GAME:

Ed K
March 21, 2010
David Wright scored 4 runs for the second game in a row setting a Met record of 8 runs in two consecutive games.

Joseph E Lambertson
April 28, 2012
Is my memory failing me when I say that I recall that Mike Jacobs hit for the cycle in this game and also had a walk? I could swear that there was a Met player who hit for the cycle in a game in the not too distant past and also drew a walk in the same game. Was it Mike Jacobs? I was reminded of this by yesterday's game April 27, 2012 in which Scott Hairston hit for the cycle. Now all we need is a no-hitter.

Michael
May 30, 2013
At the above comment: No, Jacobs did not hit for the cycle in this game. He did have 4 hits though.

Eric Valent hit for the cycle in 2004 and also had a walk; that's probably what you're thinking of.



Now it's your turn! Tell us what you remember of this game:

Please note:
We're looking for your comments about this specific game. We've had people use this space to share their thoughts on how the current season is going, or on ways that the Mets can improve the team. Such comments, unless in the context of this particular game, will be considered off-topic and will be removed.

Example One
The Mets suck! They need to trade Smith and get somebody like Jones.
This comment is off-topic and will be removed. It has nothing to do with any specific game. But here's an acceptable alternative:

Example Two
The Mets suck! Smith made three errors in this game, and hit into a double play, and the Mets blew a 5-0 lead. They need to get rid of Smith and get somebody like Jones.
See the difference? Here you're getting the same point across, but it's in the proper context. We wouldn't consider this message to be off-topic, and we would let it remain.

We do appreciate anybody who takes the time to share their thoughts on our site, and we hate to remove anybody's postings. But if we didn't take steps to ensure that only on-topic messages were retained, The Ultimate Mets Database would become a confusing jumble of unrelated comments, and would thus be less enjoyable to visitors like you.

Thank you!



Your name:
E-Mail address:
OPTIONAL
Comments about the game:






About Us
  • Contact us
  • FAQ



  • Copyright 1999-2024, The Ultimate Mets Database